AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Manpower kalamazoo karina1/6/2024 ![]() ![]() To date, most job retention efforts have focused largely on identifying and addressing the problems working recipients face in areas such as child care, transportation, and housing. Second, TANF programs have sought better ways to promote job retention and advancement. First, job search and placement assistance has been used to help re-employ TANF recipients who lost their jobs in the weaker economic environment of the last three years. More recently, the work first approach has been supplemented in two ways. Research has concluded that this reduction in welfare caseloads is due to welfare-to-work policies (1) and a robust economy. The welfare caseload dropped by more than 50 percent between 19. With the help of strong economic conditions during the 1990s, great progress was made toward this goal. The nations welfare reform efforts of the last decade, emphasizing work first sought to move families from the welfare rolls into employment. Based on this assessment, and on input from the projects expert panel, we consider a number of options for future research in this area. It presents findings from our review of the research literature related to employers and recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and summarizes what is and is not known about employer attitudes, policies, and practices. This is the final report for the study Private Employers and TANF Recipients. Finally, Jan Nicholson edited the document and Denise Young helped prepare it for publication. Srinath provided expert help with the design of the employer survey options. Richard LaRock, Fatima Mahmud, and Derrick James assisted with the literature review. Neil Bergquist and Jaime Davis helped with the project's literature review and expert panel meeting. Richard McGahey played an important oversight role in the project and Larry Orr, the project's technical reviewer, provided excellent advice and comments on this report. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research).Īt Abt Associates, Catherine Dun Rappaport was a key contributor to all aspects of this study until taking leave. Department of Health and Human Services), and Timothy Bartik and Susan Houseman (W. Department of Labor), Michael Dubinsky (Administration for Children and Families, U.S. This report also benefited from the valuable comments and suggestions we received from Stephen Wandner and Jonathan Simonetta (Employment and Training Administration, U.S. John provided thoughtful and detailed comments on earlier drafts of this report. He was active in virtually every aspect of the study. Department of Health and Human Services, for his critical role in formulating and implementing this project. Second, special thanks and credit are due to John Tambornino, of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), U.S. We particularly thank panel member Harry Holzer, who provided valuable assistance and supplied the data and supporting documentation for the employer surveys he directed in Los Angeles, Chicago, Cleveland, and Milwaukee. Through their judgments, comments and advice, they helped to “write” this report. ![]() First, we are grateful to the members of this study's expert panel - Wendy Ardagna, Timothy Bartik, Beth Buehlmann, Grant Collins, John Colborn, Harry Holzer, Susan Houseman, Katherine McFate, Branka Minic, Jason Turner, and Larry Temple - for sharing their time and insights. We have many people to thank for their contributions to this report. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |